There is only one way this ends. My fellow Americans living in the homeland have retained a right, at least in part, that you in Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere have surrendered and thus at least have a chance, melting away by the hour, to win.
For our cousins in Koala and Kiwi lands, this is the exact situation we warned of. Not that there are too many calling for the same in the US, we at least still have the power to say “No” in a voice loud enough that they must take notice.
Frankly, it is not what the tyrants at home and abroad are up to they depresses me, it is the fact that we have been warned about this for for centuries and even now, far too few are moved top action to stop it.
All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing. Good men have been doing nothing for far too long. Evil will win unless we act....and no one is acting.
And what I said, standing firm, is not an offensive act. It is a defensive line that they would have had to cross or, hopefully though doubtfully, would have stood down against.
The idea that the states won't (or haven't already) given that data to the feds is ignorant at best. "Trust me, I'm from the government." Registration always precedes confiscation. In the US it is readily apparent that the socialists in charge at various levels (most don't call themselves that) want more "gun violence" to cause the sheeple to demand confiscation. Violent criminals using illicitly-procured guns are released almost immediately to go out and do it again. "Defund the police" until chaos reigns then bring in the brown shirts. This is not a new plan and it has worked. Be alert, the world needs more lerts.
Weed has been legalized in my state for awhile but evidently there still exists a large market for the illicit variety as the taxes and other expenses have made the legal stuff more expensive. Go figure!
When workable I like to get my gas on the nearest Indian reservation as it is at least 40 cents a gallon less expensive due to no state taxes.
"For this, we will have to examine the ground upon which we are standing, take responsibility and accountability."
Yes, every single individual has an opportunity to 'own' themselves, claim their divinely given sovereignty and not go along with what is clearly wrong. Take steps - in their own lives - that align to what they know is right.
Simple, not always easy, but it does all come down to each of us.
Yes, you are absolutely right. It seems that we are being steered by some clever "resistance heroes" to "go after Pfizer" for their sloppy contamination with DNA (all true) but with the stated or unstated narrative that it was this contamination, or the nasty spike, that was the problem - and the next bunch of jabs will be all nicely cleaned up in the Moderna factories and injectable (by force if necessary) into every arm this time. The injured certainly need compensation so these law suits are justified, but we need to be very careful to hear what is not said, and who is not being "gone after". It seems fairly obvious that Pfizer was chosen as the fall-guy from the beginning, (perhaps AZ was also the "bad cop" jab to get more people clamouring for the mRNA shots?), and Moderna is planned to come out ahead. Listening to McKernan is an eye opener in this regard. They are not saying the obvious: that the platform itself is toxic; and they are not mentioning the legislative enabling and political-military-pharma alliance which rolled out the whole debacle in lockstep around the world. No, let's just sue the pants of the Pfizer-sloppyvillain!
I wonder whether McCullough has changed his mind since April - he did have an interesting discussion with JJ Couey not long ago so I'm hoping he is not still asleep about this dangerous platform.
He is a smart man. He knows what he is doing. If I wrote something like that I would definitely make a retraction - no shame in that whatsoever if your thinking/understanding evolves.
My heart weeps for mine and all family members that still don't understand.
My heart weeps for the loss of all I held dear, the sense of community, neighbors helping neighbors,
loss of family, friends and even those acquaintances one hardly knew, the realization that life was just an illusion, that life will forever be different and for the continued loss of those yet to manifest their destiny.
While 'Never again' is still echoing in the forest from a time not so long ago but it seems not enough of humanity heard the cries.
Here is a summary of the changes quietly made to the SA Emergency Act 2004.
SA Emergency Management Act, 2004:
• Appoints the Commissioner of Police as the State Co-ordinator (Part 3)
• Who may delegate any of his/her functions and powers to anyone (Part 3 sec 18)
• Who may appoint anyone he/she sees fit as an Authorised Officer (Part 3, sec 17)
• Who may: (Part 4, Div 4, sec 25)
o Enter, possess, control any land, building, structure or vehicle, or any body of water
o Destroy any building, structure, vehicle, vegetation, animal or other thing
o Remove (relocate) or prohibit movement of any person or animal or vehicle
o Direct decontamination, isolation or medical observation or preventative or active treatment of any person (Preventative would have to include forced vaccination)
I was just speaking to a Substack friend in Norway about how the PM is looting the treasury before the collapse. Something US Americans can relate to! The guy has spent over 1BN on vanity projects in the past year while entire families are sleeping in tents in the forest and jamming the country with migrants we cannot support.
Also how murders seem to be increasing - used to be that we would have a couple a year in Perth now it seems like there is one every week, or multiple.
Our LEOs are catastrophically understaffed since the mandates...I'm not complaining as police are essentially a criminal organisation. But they now do solo patrols and are agressive AF - mainly verbally. They're always grumpy and yelling at people. I think they're afraid and know that the populace is not exactly on their side anymore. The women are the scariest because they tend to be trigger happy.
Everywhere I think this has been done. It is truly these emergency powers (the legal kill box) that were laid down without our say so. They have to be abolished. how to do it?
Thanks for this. I get it. What I don't get is how these state laws can override the Aus Constitution? I mean some bureaucrat says some emergency shit and the Constitution means nothing. Even if it is a federal or territorial bureaucrat how does that work? This makes the entire Constitution null and void and a nothing burger. The constitution says I can not be forced into medical shit. It says that and now, all of a sudden, it doesn't mean anything? Somehow I am now a slave at the whim of my masters. Someone please explain , anyone explain it to me. This has been doing my head in for years. I mean the whole referendum, why would the Aboriginal people even want to be in it if it means nothing? Even in war times people have human rights. The lawyers are having orgasms over Gaza right now but I have no rights! I have no constitution! The status quo simply sucks.
There is something else that I did not discuss in the article but was vitally important and would have absolutely been wargamed. I'm calling it 'Emergency-by-Media' but it was essentially co-opting citizens to police the response (and each other) to 1) shift the blame for the killing from government and 2) ensure that the response took on a life of its own in the community to make the response diffuse and total.
This is the hardest thing for people to come to grips with. There are some bright lights in the world who do understand this (Ernesto Ramirez Sr. comes to mind) but they are few and far between.
When (for example) mothers injected their children and killed them and said nothing, when my neighbour said I should be 'liquidated in a camp,' when by-standers watched people get kidnapped and shot by law enforcement and laughed or turned their backs, the responsibility of perpetuating the 'Emergency' became total in the community.
The emergency took on a life of its own in an extrajudicial manner and the planners would have absolutely known that this would be a wicked problem that people would have a hard time coming to grips with psychologically.
Yes Thankyou again for all that you are doing. But isn't this exactly why we have Constitutions and Treatises and Bills of Rights and Conventions and even laws and courts and judges and juries and legal precedents and even police? So the psychopathic and the morons don't just get to eat us? The most powerful weapon that society or family has is ostracism. And they have royally abused it, but not for the first time in history. There are remedies or solutions but I am just not smart enough to know what they are. You are definitely helping us all to figure this out. Keep at it. Love to Vic Park.
The greatest killer of unarmed citizens in the 20th century was government, and all the pieces of paper did not stop them because they did not want to stop. Now, it's turned on you. The government will not save you with their pieces of paper because they are trying to kill you. Your survival is in your hands alone.
Consider the following from the Gulag Archepelago:
"We have been happily borne-or perhaps unhappily dragged our weary way-down the long and crooked streets of our lives, past all kinds of wall and fences made of rotting wood, rammed earth, brick, concrete, iron railings. We have never given a thought to what lies behind them. We have never tried to penetrate them with our vision or our understanding. But there is where the Gulag country begins, right next to us, two yards away from us. In addition, we have failed to notice an enormous number of closely fitted, well-disguised doors and gates in these fences. All those gates were prepared for us, every last one! And all of a sudden the fateful gate swings quickly open, and four white male hands, unaccustomed to physical labor but nonetheless strong and tenacious, grab us by the leg, arm, collar, cap, ear, and drag us in like a sack, and the gate behind us, the gate to our past life, is slammed shut once and for all.
That's all there is to it! You are arrested!
An you'll find nothing better to respond with than a lamblike bleat: "Me? What for?""
The Treaties and Bills are just papering over the window of the Gulag they prepared for you and you are still asking 'why me?' It's an illusion.
It would seem that the Biosecurity laws suspend the constitution? Or else they know they can get away with it because hardly anyone knows the constitution.
When the Emergency lever is pulled they go all in. Everyone in society is co-opted, media panics people, rational thought is gone, and the people police each other.
Indeed. What everyone forgets is that they have unalienable rights and everything is an offer to contract. All the hysteria is designed to stop us from realising that.
Fraudulent emergency health powers are the simple rosetta stone to interpret the whole awakening!
I have been trying to consume writers expressing this simple, irrefutable, yet almost impossible to digest truth.
Often I 'see' ExcessDeathsAU in comment sections (aka, mental gymnasiums) - a tribute to the work that goes on behind the scenes of these articles.
Among illustrious company, each trying to express in a different style, (eg. Michael Ginsburg, CJ Hopkins, Ah Khan Syed, Sage Hana, Robyn Chuter) this has been the most satisfying explanation so far. Many thanks.
Any lawyers brave enough to take on a case to sue anyone connected with the scam will be de-registered by the state and government. This has already happened in Victoria.
Rebecca, I am puzzled by your para .2 cited below and have a dry legal question:
"'Pharma' did not lock us down and bash us in the streets, craft and declare the State(s) of Emergency, nullify our rights, pass the state and federal Acts over the past decades to make killing, kidnap, psychological warfare, torture and confinement legal. Yes, legal. Not moral, but legal under the States of Emergency and various dovetailed Acts".
Assuming you are referring to state and federal Acts of Aust. and not the USA, I am not aware of the decades-long alterations in Aust. you mention. Yes I was however aware of the WA Act of 2016 and the SA Em. Management Act 2004 changes in Nov 2021. I also read the Fed. Biosec. Act 2015 and could not find any reference to forced jabbing in it.
That is, on the one hand I have read the work of Katherine Watt and Sasha L for the USA, with Katherine tracing the initial legal changes back to the late 60s.
But on the other, I am aware that Sen Roberts references for Aust here:
the Medical Countermeasures Consortium of basically the Five Eyes countries which Aust. joined in 2012 under Gillard (now at the Wellcome Trust.: chair of the non -exec. Directors).
Now this implies to me that whatever changes to US law had been made by 2012 got written over into Aust. law at that time but is that possible? Or does (serving officer) Frewen's role as military impresario of the jab rollout in Aust. 2021 imply that such a write-over was not needed? If so, why not?
We appear to have no equivalent to K. Watt in AU to tell us.
Or are you meaning with "dovetailed acts" the various legal "anti-terror"changes made by Howard and others after 9/11 in 2001?
For those who want more, please understand, 'you've been sparred.'
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-spars-pandemic-planning-exercise
They put out these 'scenarios' as plausible deniability for when the real thing happens.
There is only one way this ends. My fellow Americans living in the homeland have retained a right, at least in part, that you in Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere have surrendered and thus at least have a chance, melting away by the hour, to win.
For our cousins in Koala and Kiwi lands, this is the exact situation we warned of. Not that there are too many calling for the same in the US, we at least still have the power to say “No” in a voice loud enough that they must take notice.
Frankly, it is not what the tyrants at home and abroad are up to they depresses me, it is the fact that we have been warned about this for for centuries and even now, far too few are moved top action to stop it.
All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing. Good men have been doing nothing for far too long. Evil will win unless we act....and no one is acting.
It's grim.
It is indeed.
People who want to know more about firearm ownership in Australia can see this article by the Australia Institute (report attached): "Australia: More Guns Now Than Before Port Arthur" https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/australia-more-guns-now-than-before-port-arthur/
The West Australian police 'accidentally' released a map of legal firearms owners in a few suburbs in Perth (not accidental, political move of course) and ownership was extensive: https://www.watoday.com.au/national/wa-gun-owners-demand-apology-for-police-map-showing-their-locations-20220324-p5a7r0.html
Australia also does not have a national owner-firearm registry database. That is handled by states. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/may/27/australian-police-renew-calls-for-national-firearms-database-following-mass-shootings-in-the-us
According to Google maps there are currently 12 firearms and ammo dealers in the greater Perth region and they are not all selling to the police.
That is good to know. However, if true, then just as in the States, not heavy in meaning if those who can resist do not.
You cannot shoot your way out of an information war.
Anyone advocating offensive violence on my platform will be considered a law enforcement agitator and banned. This is your final warning.
And what I said, standing firm, is not an offensive act. It is a defensive line that they would have had to cross or, hopefully though doubtfully, would have stood down against.
The idea that the states won't (or haven't already) given that data to the feds is ignorant at best. "Trust me, I'm from the government." Registration always precedes confiscation. In the US it is readily apparent that the socialists in charge at various levels (most don't call themselves that) want more "gun violence" to cause the sheeple to demand confiscation. Violent criminals using illicitly-procured guns are released almost immediately to go out and do it again. "Defund the police" until chaos reigns then bring in the brown shirts. This is not a new plan and it has worked. Be alert, the world needs more lerts.
I saw an extremely interesting statistic that 85% of Australia's tobacco sales are on the black market.
...
...
Weed has been legalized in my state for awhile but evidently there still exists a large market for the illicit variety as the taxes and other expenses have made the legal stuff more expensive. Go figure!
When workable I like to get my gas on the nearest Indian reservation as it is at least 40 cents a gallon less expensive due to no state taxes.
"For this, we will have to examine the ground upon which we are standing, take responsibility and accountability."
Yes, every single individual has an opportunity to 'own' themselves, claim their divinely given sovereignty and not go along with what is clearly wrong. Take steps - in their own lives - that align to what they know is right.
Simple, not always easy, but it does all come down to each of us.
- ABSOLUTELY RIGHT- there is no other solution, what so ever, in my humble opinion. Thanks for your post.
Yes, you are absolutely right. It seems that we are being steered by some clever "resistance heroes" to "go after Pfizer" for their sloppy contamination with DNA (all true) but with the stated or unstated narrative that it was this contamination, or the nasty spike, that was the problem - and the next bunch of jabs will be all nicely cleaned up in the Moderna factories and injectable (by force if necessary) into every arm this time. The injured certainly need compensation so these law suits are justified, but we need to be very careful to hear what is not said, and who is not being "gone after". It seems fairly obvious that Pfizer was chosen as the fall-guy from the beginning, (perhaps AZ was also the "bad cop" jab to get more people clamouring for the mRNA shots?), and Moderna is planned to come out ahead. Listening to McKernan is an eye opener in this regard. They are not saying the obvious: that the platform itself is toxic; and they are not mentioning the legislative enabling and political-military-pharma alliance which rolled out the whole debacle in lockstep around the world. No, let's just sue the pants of the Pfizer-sloppyvillain!
When I saw this article by Peter McCullough referencing the paper by Jessica Rose and Tess Laurie I knew this would be the play:
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines
mRNA Off to a Bad Start but Future May be Brighter
Lots of 'handwaving' about 'saying things to get published' but yeah. Power structure still in place, pharma bad.
Edit: and that line about "old mental saws" like we are all idiots who cannot grasp new concepts.
LEAD ME O GREAT THOUGHT LEADER
💯
I wonder whether McCullough has changed his mind since April - he did have an interesting discussion with JJ Couey not long ago so I'm hoping he is not still asleep about this dangerous platform.
He is a smart man. He knows what he is doing. If I wrote something like that I would definitely make a retraction - no shame in that whatsoever if your thinking/understanding evolves.
🎯
My heart weeps.
My heart weeps for mine and all family members that still don't understand.
My heart weeps for the loss of all I held dear, the sense of community, neighbors helping neighbors,
loss of family, friends and even those acquaintances one hardly knew, the realization that life was just an illusion, that life will forever be different and for the continued loss of those yet to manifest their destiny.
While 'Never again' is still echoing in the forest from a time not so long ago but it seems not enough of humanity heard the cries.
Thank you,
I have been.
You as well.
Start planting.
Here is a summary of the changes quietly made to the SA Emergency Act 2004.
SA Emergency Management Act, 2004:
• Appoints the Commissioner of Police as the State Co-ordinator (Part 3)
• Who may delegate any of his/her functions and powers to anyone (Part 3 sec 18)
• Who may appoint anyone he/she sees fit as an Authorised Officer (Part 3, sec 17)
• Who may: (Part 4, Div 4, sec 25)
o Enter, possess, control any land, building, structure or vehicle, or any body of water
o Destroy any building, structure, vehicle, vegetation, animal or other thing
o Remove (relocate) or prohibit movement of any person or animal or vehicle
o Direct decontamination, isolation or medical observation or preventative or active treatment of any person (Preventative would have to include forced vaccination)
o Enlist anyone to assist in these matters
o Exercise any prescribed power
See Act in this link for full details:
https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/__legislation/lz/c/a/emergency%20management%20act%202004/current/2004.30.auth.pdf
Why would pharma do this??!!111!!
Just checking in. How’s the world down undah today?
I was just speaking to a Substack friend in Norway about how the PM is looting the treasury before the collapse. Something US Americans can relate to! The guy has spent over 1BN on vanity projects in the past year while entire families are sleeping in tents in the forest and jamming the country with migrants we cannot support.
Also how murders seem to be increasing - used to be that we would have a couple a year in Perth now it seems like there is one every week, or multiple.
What's happening in Maui?
I do see a financial collapse coming. I need more prep time.
I'm just going to wing it until the nukes fly tbh fam.
I’ve reached a point where I’m not entirely sold on nukes ... just sayin’.
Maui generally has very few visible law enforcement personnel ... now we have them everywhere.
Oahu is seeing a significant uptick in violence.
Our LEOs are catastrophically understaffed since the mandates...I'm not complaining as police are essentially a criminal organisation. But they now do solo patrols and are agressive AF - mainly verbally. They're always grumpy and yelling at people. I think they're afraid and know that the populace is not exactly on their side anymore. The women are the scariest because they tend to be trigger happy.
We’re catastrophically overstaffed since the fire ... imagine?! I’ve had to cut my day drinking way back!
Everywhere I think this has been done. It is truly these emergency powers (the legal kill box) that were laid down without our say so. They have to be abolished. how to do it?
...To be stripped naked, head shaved, and marched into the "showers" for decontamination of lice and other vermin.
What a nice world Satan has prepared to frustrate the heart of God! Soon this will be a thing of the past. Eternity awaits the Faithful!
Ray
Thanks for this. I get it. What I don't get is how these state laws can override the Aus Constitution? I mean some bureaucrat says some emergency shit and the Constitution means nothing. Even if it is a federal or territorial bureaucrat how does that work? This makes the entire Constitution null and void and a nothing burger. The constitution says I can not be forced into medical shit. It says that and now, all of a sudden, it doesn't mean anything? Somehow I am now a slave at the whim of my masters. Someone please explain , anyone explain it to me. This has been doing my head in for years. I mean the whole referendum, why would the Aboriginal people even want to be in it if it means nothing? Even in war times people have human rights. The lawyers are having orgasms over Gaza right now but I have no rights! I have no constitution! The status quo simply sucks.
Awesome comment, thanks.
There is something else that I did not discuss in the article but was vitally important and would have absolutely been wargamed. I'm calling it 'Emergency-by-Media' but it was essentially co-opting citizens to police the response (and each other) to 1) shift the blame for the killing from government and 2) ensure that the response took on a life of its own in the community to make the response diffuse and total.
This is the hardest thing for people to come to grips with. There are some bright lights in the world who do understand this (Ernesto Ramirez Sr. comes to mind) but they are few and far between.
When (for example) mothers injected their children and killed them and said nothing, when my neighbour said I should be 'liquidated in a camp,' when by-standers watched people get kidnapped and shot by law enforcement and laughed or turned their backs, the responsibility of perpetuating the 'Emergency' became total in the community.
The emergency took on a life of its own in an extrajudicial manner and the planners would have absolutely known that this would be a wicked problem that people would have a hard time coming to grips with psychologically.
I had a post-war German describe his experience with both the war and covid in one of my articles: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-fault-lines-will-we-ever
So to answer your question, this is not just a legal issue. Not really. It played on the deepest psychology of the human experience.
Yes Thankyou again for all that you are doing. But isn't this exactly why we have Constitutions and Treatises and Bills of Rights and Conventions and even laws and courts and judges and juries and legal precedents and even police? So the psychopathic and the morons don't just get to eat us? The most powerful weapon that society or family has is ostracism. And they have royally abused it, but not for the first time in history. There are remedies or solutions but I am just not smart enough to know what they are. You are definitely helping us all to figure this out. Keep at it. Love to Vic Park.
The greatest killer of unarmed citizens in the 20th century was government, and all the pieces of paper did not stop them because they did not want to stop. Now, it's turned on you. The government will not save you with their pieces of paper because they are trying to kill you. Your survival is in your hands alone.
Consider the following from the Gulag Archepelago:
"We have been happily borne-or perhaps unhappily dragged our weary way-down the long and crooked streets of our lives, past all kinds of wall and fences made of rotting wood, rammed earth, brick, concrete, iron railings. We have never given a thought to what lies behind them. We have never tried to penetrate them with our vision or our understanding. But there is where the Gulag country begins, right next to us, two yards away from us. In addition, we have failed to notice an enormous number of closely fitted, well-disguised doors and gates in these fences. All those gates were prepared for us, every last one! And all of a sudden the fateful gate swings quickly open, and four white male hands, unaccustomed to physical labor but nonetheless strong and tenacious, grab us by the leg, arm, collar, cap, ear, and drag us in like a sack, and the gate behind us, the gate to our past life, is slammed shut once and for all.
That's all there is to it! You are arrested!
An you'll find nothing better to respond with than a lamblike bleat: "Me? What for?""
The Treaties and Bills are just papering over the window of the Gulag they prepared for you and you are still asking 'why me?' It's an illusion.
It would seem that the Biosecurity laws suspend the constitution? Or else they know they can get away with it because hardly anyone knows the constitution.
When the Emergency lever is pulled they go all in. Everyone in society is co-opted, media panics people, rational thought is gone, and the people police each other.
Beware 'Emergencies.'
Indeed. What everyone forgets is that they have unalienable rights and everything is an offer to contract. All the hysteria is designed to stop us from realising that.
YOUR GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO KILL YOU. Write it on the back of your front door.
I wrote it on my face and my front door.
Is that ok?
Write it on the outside of your back-door too !!!
Government officers may approach your family from that side next time ...🤔🤔
Really? In lipstick or something? LOL.
Fraudulent emergency health powers are the simple rosetta stone to interpret the whole awakening!
I have been trying to consume writers expressing this simple, irrefutable, yet almost impossible to digest truth.
Often I 'see' ExcessDeathsAU in comment sections (aka, mental gymnasiums) - a tribute to the work that goes on behind the scenes of these articles.
Among illustrious company, each trying to express in a different style, (eg. Michael Ginsburg, CJ Hopkins, Ah Khan Syed, Sage Hana, Robyn Chuter) this has been the most satisfying explanation so far. Many thanks.
Thanks Shane - that's a nice turn of phrase 'simple rosetta stone.' I totally agree.
Any lawyers brave enough to take on a case to sue anyone connected with the scam will be de-registered by the state and government. This has already happened in Victoria.
I remember that very well in relation to the tower lockdown.
Good example of institutional capture.
Glad I found this page, powerful and important
Welcome
Rebecca, I am puzzled by your para .2 cited below and have a dry legal question:
"'Pharma' did not lock us down and bash us in the streets, craft and declare the State(s) of Emergency, nullify our rights, pass the state and federal Acts over the past decades to make killing, kidnap, psychological warfare, torture and confinement legal. Yes, legal. Not moral, but legal under the States of Emergency and various dovetailed Acts".
Assuming you are referring to state and federal Acts of Aust. and not the USA, I am not aware of the decades-long alterations in Aust. you mention. Yes I was however aware of the WA Act of 2016 and the SA Em. Management Act 2004 changes in Nov 2021. I also read the Fed. Biosec. Act 2015 and could not find any reference to forced jabbing in it.
That is, on the one hand I have read the work of Katherine Watt and Sasha L for the USA, with Katherine tracing the initial legal changes back to the late 60s.
But on the other, I am aware that Sen Roberts references for Aust here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gsT47coM84gl/
the Medical Countermeasures Consortium of basically the Five Eyes countries which Aust. joined in 2012 under Gillard (now at the Wellcome Trust.: chair of the non -exec. Directors).
Now this implies to me that whatever changes to US law had been made by 2012 got written over into Aust. law at that time but is that possible? Or does (serving officer) Frewen's role as military impresario of the jab rollout in Aust. 2021 imply that such a write-over was not needed? If so, why not?
We appear to have no equivalent to K. Watt in AU to tell us.
Or are you meaning with "dovetailed acts" the various legal "anti-terror"changes made by Howard and others after 9/11 in 2001?
Hi there, my name is not Rebecca.
Suggest re-reading the article and links which should answer your many of your questions.
Apart from that I am unsure about much of what you are asking.