Gates meets with Australian PM to “prepare for next pandemic”
It's not going to work this time. We will not comply.
They are planning more lockdowns and injections: here’s the evidence
Criminals act in predictable patterns, and if they are allowed to get away with it the first time, they will escalate the behaviour and rub their crimes in your face. If you can accept that criminals such as serial killers live among us, you must also accept that criminals also operate in governments and health departments. This is what we are currently seeing in Australia.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese recently met with Bill Gates to “discuss climate change, energy and health issues.” Albanese said (of Gates) “I’ve admired your work…we are engaged in setting a whole range of mechanisms that will drive private sector investment.” Gates then thanked the PM for his “great partnership on international health issues…the preparedness for the next pandemic is still a discussion that hasn’t been figured out.”
He’s lying. They’re both lying. They know exactly what they are going to do when the “next pandemic comes” and the framework has been laid. Here is the evidence:
Exhibit A. Public-private mRNA vaccine production facilities are being built in Queensland and Victoria.
Exhibit B. Injection of Australian livestock with mRNA products with a company tied to the US Army’s Fort Detrick bioweapons facility, the Gates Foundation and the NIH.
Exhibit C. Public-private vaccine pharmaceutical contracts withheld from public scrutiny.
Exhibit D. State laws to be triggered upon the declaration of a pandemic that will allow removal, detention and injection of citizens with covid vaccines by force.
Exhibit E. Construction and maintenance of large, currently empty camps through the ‘Centre for National Resilience’. On May 25, 2022 Western Australia’s Premier Mark McGowan “floated potentially using the compound as a Commonwealth detention facility.”
Exhibit F. Australia’s gain-of-function research program increasing the lethality of already deadly viruses and bacteria.
Exhibit G. Australia’s response in place as evidenced by The Science (TM): “Future covid variants and outbreaks would be best managed by ongoing vaccination and quicker scaling up of restrictions” that include “more stringent restrictions” according to University of Melbourne modellers.
Exhibit H. The ‘one document to rule them all’: the new WHO pandemic treaty. Dr. Francis Boyle, US bioweapons expert has a qualified take on the implications of this document for Australia, which is ceding of complete national sovereignty to the WHO.
Some of the items in the document I found interesting:
“Understanding that most emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, including wildlife and domestic animals, then spill over to people”
o translation: Pandemics do not come from labs. Do not even look.
Emphasis of the “One Health Approach” mobilising “multiple sectors, disciplines and communities at varying levels of society to work together” including “universal health coverage, food, water and veterinary.”
o translation: Individual choice is over. We will control everything.
“Recognizing the central role of WHO in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, and in convening and generating scientific evidence, and, more generally, fostering multilateral cooperation in global health governance.”
o translation: The WHO will be in your GP’s office, farm, school, hospital and university.
o Or in the words of the WEF: “We own the science and think that the world should know it.” (yes, this is an absolutely real quote, watch the video). Remember what I said about them rubbing it in your face?
The above seemingly conflicts with the following ‘principles’ in document Article 4: ‘respect for human rights’, but when you understand what is happening, it really doesn’t. When the WHO decides what constitutes ‘human rights’ there is no conflict. Article 4 also talks about ‘respect for national sovereignty.’ Well, no conflict there either. When the leaders have sold their countries to the WHO, again, there is no conflict. (Remember well the picture of the Australian PM with Bill Gates, or the fact that Bill Gates is the largest private owner of farmland in the USA).
I encourage you to read the document thoroughly and understand all the components, particularly those which discuss monitoring populations and data collection. The WHO calls for “transparency,” but we know that transparency will only go one way. As with the covid pandemic, government data will be hidden, obfuscated, not collected, or blatantly lied about. Lines like “the best health advice” will never be explained using data with clear methods. The ‘data transparency’ they talk about is associated with monitoring our every move for whatever reason they want. (Remember when the Western Australian police were using covid QR codes to track people for non-covid issues for “the safety of the community?)
So what are they planning? Given past behaviour, and the above framework, I suspect that they will release a novel virus from a lab to trigger a ‘pandemic’ and try to scare people to accept every control that they have implemented. The reasons are many.
However, buried in the WHO document is one very important line: “Pandemics begin and end in communities.” So does freedom, and this is our way forward.
Do. Not. Comply.
The proportion of compliant Australians is shrinking
The Australian government, judiciary, police and military are captured because the ones who can think for themselves have quit due to the vaccine mandates. They will do the bidding of their masters for increasing pay packets while a certain proportion of the citizens will cheer them on, either out of fear or genuine devotion to the system. There are some shining examples of Australian politicians who champion freedom, particularly Senator Gerard Rennick, but they are extremely rare at state and federal levels. Only one MP in Western Australia (Sophia Moermond) truly stood up against the vaccine mandates.
However, there are fewer Australians to scare now which is reflected in the lagging covid booster uptake. Unfortunately, I have no doubt that a proportion of the population will actively support the forcible removal, detention, and injection of citizens. I call these people the ‘true believers.’
‘True believers’ will clap like trained seals as brutal human rights abuses are carried out right in front of them ‘for the greater good,’ often believing themselves to be ‘human rights activists.’ I think that these true believers are in a terminal ego spiral: their identities are built on being ‘smartest person in the room’ and they cannot bear to accept the fact that they have been conned. These people have staked their entire identies on “the science (TM)” and browbeating others (and sadly, injecting their children) and must quadruple down in even the face of official government evidence that the majority of excess deaths in Australia are not covid-related.
The true believers, shrinking minority that they are, will never acknowledge the harm caused by lockdowns, or that people were harmed by the vaccine. This Melbourne man was so distressed by Dan Andrews’ tyranny that he set himself on fire. Some people, out of work and out of hope, suicided like actor Dieter Brummer. I think about the people destroyed by government covid policies every day.
So how do we deal with the true believers in our midst? We ignore them. We go about our business peacefully. Walking around and a true believer is hounding you? Ignore them. We do not give them the attention that they crave.
If they are in positions of power over us, browbeating us into doing things that go against our principles we say NO. Remember this: “NO” is a complete sentence. So is silence. You do not have to explain yourself. Set an example of peaceful non-compliance for the fearful observers. (N.b., if someone comes at us with an injection, we will consider this an attempt on our lives and act accordingly).
We, the freedom-loving people of Australia have deep convictions and form a formidable alliance of skills. We are all races, colours and creeds and far more diverse than the ‘forced diversity’ of government panels who may look different but think alike. And they know this. Our ranks are growing, and those of us who have demonstrated courage of conviction from the beginning are leading the way, because for many of us this is a spiritual war. That is why they are so desperate to imprison, censor and destroy us. Make us “examples” to the timid. But we are not afraid. And we will never back down.
By the way, all of us who laid down our fluoro on the steps of parliament house are still out here. So go ahead. Make your little ‘preparations.’ Remember, this ends and begins in communities. You said so yourself.
ExcessDeathsAU is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The fact that the PM of Australia met with Bill Gates, who was closely associated with Jeffrey Epstein even after Epstein was convicted of soliciting a child for prostitution is unbelievably disturbing. Gates’ wife left him when his association with Epstein was made public. Epstein’s ‘black books’ are sealed. Who is in those books? Why haven’t those books been released? The children had to go somewhere.
If Albanese said ‘I will be meeting with Bill Gates a known close associate of the world’s foremost paedophile’ how many people would have voted for him?
Honestly, it was a shock to see the PM of Australia meeting with Gates, not just because of the sovereignty issues but the association with Epstein. This is a perfect example of the attempted demoralisation campaign as they ‘rub it in our faces’.
Please see this post by Meryl Nass (highlighting an Editorial in The Lancet) about how the WHO "One Health" ideology will be used for "ecological equity." "Decolonisation" and "reducing human pressure on the environment." Sounds like depopulaton to me.
Keen insights. Excellent work. Thank you.