Thanks to your efforts, as of June 12 this article has now been seen 4k times (an increase of 500 from when I sent out the email).
However, I looked at my dashboard and saw the following:
2% social media views.
This means that sharing this on social media is useless - no one is seeing it due to shadowbanning. Re-Stacking this is futile - we are in an echo chamber - people do not even know that Substack exists, and we are siloed within Substack.
So, if you are motivated, please:
-email this to one friend, and one person in the media/government.
If you are not interested, that’s ok. Thanks for reading.
Quantitative evaluation of whether the Nobel-Prize-winning COVID-19 vaccine actually saved millions of lives By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, and Joseph Hickey, PhD.
Fantastic statements that the Nobel-Prize-winning COVID-19 vaccines saved millions (and tens of millions) of lives are based on the theoretical scenarios of Watson et al. (2022), published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Watson et al. (2022) theoretically inferred massive mortality reductions distributed globally, occurring solely during vaccine rollouts. We calculated the quantitative consequences of Watson et al. (2022)’s low-value (14.4 million lives saved) theoretical scenario on all-cause mortality by time (by week or by month, 2020-2022) in 95 countries. Our calculations provide graphical proof that the theoretical proposals of Watson et al. (2022) are untenable, compared to measured all-cause mortality. Therefore, the characteristics of the COVID‑19 vaccines (efficacies in preventing infection or serious illness, duration of protection, waning, etc.) and of COVID-19 spread input by Watson et al. (2022) must be invalid.
Another stellar article, thanks. It's all blazingly obvious, all questions that must be answered.
My heart aches. What happened to the soul of a man who can watch thousands of his own be tortured, maimed and murdered while he calls for more of it? Satan laughs. Does no one ponder what awaits them in eternity?
To answer your question - this terrifies me, and I thought about this exact thing a lot while I wrote this article. I have hit rock bottom thinking about what was done to humanity and I tried to stop it, working tirelessly against this, and never hurt anyone.
All I would say to these people is: repent. Come out from the shadows. Sit in front of a camera and tell everything that you know. Do it now before it is too late...because it is nearly too late.
I can tell - it's keeping you up at 2:30 in the morning. It's a constant effort to keep in mind that they've accomplished their goal, while it seems that life goes on. We work, shop, eat, pray, hoping for the best. But it's all going to collapse when there are too many bodies and not enough crematoriums.
I would be very happy to assist any legal or police team/investigation into this matter. I know they read my Substack.
While the WA Emergency and Health Act may protect murderers, I believe what I have demonstrated here is beyond what most people would consider reasonable under the law.
We need to start seeing arrest warrants and the Emergency tested in court, because if Australian public servants are allowed to commit democide for YEARS, Western Australia is nothing more than an open-air government extermination facility.
What 'they' fail to understand is that we are not trapped in here with them.
They are trapped in here with us.
Therefore, it is critical the wheels of justice start to turn.
I'd certainly be happy to contribute to a GoFundMe or similar. At the very least, not investigating the excess deaths once the jabbing started, in the absence of COVID as McGowan was so pleased to tell everyone at the time, shows, IMO, gross negligence of the CHO.
The problem any legal action will have, is that although the judiciary is supposed to be independent of government, it doesn't seem to work that way.
As everyone knows I have been critical of pretty much all the cases and placebo 'wins' in Australia thus far. However, if someone were to stress-test mass murder (etc.) under the letter of the Emergency in the courts I would be very, very, interested indeed. So - how far does indemnity go?
Also, of course, if any of these idiot politicians could remove the Emergencies and Acts before the next shitshow so we do not have to go through this again that would be great (they won't).
🙏once you turned that corner ( thanks to articles like this) and understand that it's a form of warfare so much falls into place - my trust in governance has gone they are not doing what's best for me
I share every article you send. Not a large reach as I was banished from both FB & twitter several years ago, so Gettr is my only social page, which is pro-Trump, & I can't vote for him since he's still claiming the bioweapon jabs saved millions of lives. Not possible to be ignorant at this point. It's a huge RED line when our own gov'ts set about to kill us to attain depopulation! There has to be accountability!
In the US, we are in such a mess under thug-rule in DC, & my heart goes out to Australia.
Thank you Anna Marie - for your support and efforts.
My articles are shadowbanned on platforms like Gettr, and social media is not a useful way to share the links. On my author dashboard I can see where everyone has opened the article links, and few people open them on social media. They are totally banned on X.
Also, simply restacking on Substack, while awsome and welcome, does not bust out of the echo chamber. These 'big name' substackers have huge teams working for them or are run by government organisations and are not media banned - I am just one person.
The only reliable way I have found that people outside the echo chamber can see my articles are by direct email, Telegram, and Signal.
I have even tried texting an article to a friend on the Apple platform, standing right next to them, but it was denied service. However, Signal allowed the text.
The most important thing people in the US can do is physically email the link to 'alt. news' organisations, but they won't usually touch my work either.
So, unfortunately, posting a link to social media is not just next to useless, it is also worse for the poster because their own account gets deboosted and shadowbanned.
I’m sure you’re correct. It’s very sad what has become of so called free countries. Most folks I know don’t even use email anymore. And I have a few family & even fewer friends who still use it. And still refuse to discuss anything jab related, as if acknowledging or discussing the damage done makes it worse? There is such a willful blindness to the extent of corruption in this whole scenario, IMO.
It definitely takes time for people to process at their own rate, but we’re running out of time. If even one hears, or reads something that makes them think seriously about what’s being done, well, that matters. Keep keeping on the best you can. God will have the last word. He’s also the originator, guardian, & publisher of truth.
"God will have the last word. He’s also the originator, guardian, & publisher of truth."
Amen!
Your comment is also so fascinating. If people do not have email and only use social media, their entire world is highly curated, managed and weaponised. However, politicians, media, journalists, police, and lawyers have and use email in their professional capacities. Maybe that is where the focus should be.
Dear Readers,
Thanks to your efforts, as of June 12 this article has now been seen 4k times (an increase of 500 from when I sent out the email).
However, I looked at my dashboard and saw the following:
2% social media views.
This means that sharing this on social media is useless - no one is seeing it due to shadowbanning. Re-Stacking this is futile - we are in an echo chamber - people do not even know that Substack exists, and we are siloed within Substack.
So, if you are motivated, please:
-email this to one friend, and one person in the media/government.
If you are not interested, that’s ok. Thanks for reading.
And please see:
Quantitative evaluation of whether the Nobel-Prize-winning COVID-19 vaccine actually saved millions of lives By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, and Joseph Hickey, PhD.
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/quantitative-evaluation-of-whether
Abstract
Fantastic statements that the Nobel-Prize-winning COVID-19 vaccines saved millions (and tens of millions) of lives are based on the theoretical scenarios of Watson et al. (2022), published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Watson et al. (2022) theoretically inferred massive mortality reductions distributed globally, occurring solely during vaccine rollouts. We calculated the quantitative consequences of Watson et al. (2022)’s low-value (14.4 million lives saved) theoretical scenario on all-cause mortality by time (by week or by month, 2020-2022) in 95 countries. Our calculations provide graphical proof that the theoretical proposals of Watson et al. (2022) are untenable, compared to measured all-cause mortality. Therefore, the characteristics of the COVID‑19 vaccines (efficacies in preventing infection or serious illness, duration of protection, waning, etc.) and of COVID-19 spread input by Watson et al. (2022) must be invalid.
Another stellar article, thanks. It's all blazingly obvious, all questions that must be answered.
My heart aches. What happened to the soul of a man who can watch thousands of his own be tortured, maimed and murdered while he calls for more of it? Satan laughs. Does no one ponder what awaits them in eternity?
Thank you Jerry, and for your support.
To answer your question - this terrifies me, and I thought about this exact thing a lot while I wrote this article. I have hit rock bottom thinking about what was done to humanity and I tried to stop it, working tirelessly against this, and never hurt anyone.
All I would say to these people is: repent. Come out from the shadows. Sit in front of a camera and tell everything that you know. Do it now before it is too late...because it is nearly too late.
I can tell - it's keeping you up at 2:30 in the morning. It's a constant effort to keep in mind that they've accomplished their goal, while it seems that life goes on. We work, shop, eat, pray, hoping for the best. But it's all going to collapse when there are too many bodies and not enough crematoriums.
24 January, 2023: Hon. Amber-Jade Sanderson MLA announces McGowan Government to expand the State Mortuary
Improved facilities for pathologists to determine the cause of unexplained or unexpected deaths in WA
https://www.wa.gov.au/government/media-statements/McGowan-Labor-Government/McGowan-Government-to-expand-the-State-Mortuary-20230124
https://archive.li/YT1th
Great article. Another one, like Fauci, who belongs in jail. Chief Health Officer - more like Chief Harms Officer.
I would be very happy to assist any legal or police team/investigation into this matter. I know they read my Substack.
While the WA Emergency and Health Act may protect murderers, I believe what I have demonstrated here is beyond what most people would consider reasonable under the law.
We need to start seeing arrest warrants and the Emergency tested in court, because if Australian public servants are allowed to commit democide for YEARS, Western Australia is nothing more than an open-air government extermination facility.
What 'they' fail to understand is that we are not trapped in here with them.
They are trapped in here with us.
Therefore, it is critical the wheels of justice start to turn.
I'd certainly be happy to contribute to a GoFundMe or similar. At the very least, not investigating the excess deaths once the jabbing started, in the absence of COVID as McGowan was so pleased to tell everyone at the time, shows, IMO, gross negligence of the CHO.
The problem any legal action will have, is that although the judiciary is supposed to be independent of government, it doesn't seem to work that way.
Yes, for sure.
As everyone knows I have been critical of pretty much all the cases and placebo 'wins' in Australia thus far. However, if someone were to stress-test mass murder (etc.) under the letter of the Emergency in the courts I would be very, very, interested indeed. So - how far does indemnity go?
Also, of course, if any of these idiot politicians could remove the Emergencies and Acts before the next shitshow so we do not have to go through this again that would be great (they won't).
🙏once you turned that corner ( thanks to articles like this) and understand that it's a form of warfare so much falls into place - my trust in governance has gone they are not doing what's best for me
Jac, the vast majority of people refuse to make this cognitive leap. To do so requires great fortitude, but it will save your life. Bless you mate.
Thank you. I am grateful for your work.
Thank you Momo. I am incredibly grateful for your support.
I share every article you send. Not a large reach as I was banished from both FB & twitter several years ago, so Gettr is my only social page, which is pro-Trump, & I can't vote for him since he's still claiming the bioweapon jabs saved millions of lives. Not possible to be ignorant at this point. It's a huge RED line when our own gov'ts set about to kill us to attain depopulation! There has to be accountability!
In the US, we are in such a mess under thug-rule in DC, & my heart goes out to Australia.
Thank you, for your great work.
Thank you Anna Marie - for your support and efforts.
My articles are shadowbanned on platforms like Gettr, and social media is not a useful way to share the links. On my author dashboard I can see where everyone has opened the article links, and few people open them on social media. They are totally banned on X.
Also, simply restacking on Substack, while awsome and welcome, does not bust out of the echo chamber. These 'big name' substackers have huge teams working for them or are run by government organisations and are not media banned - I am just one person.
The only reliable way I have found that people outside the echo chamber can see my articles are by direct email, Telegram, and Signal.
I have even tried texting an article to a friend on the Apple platform, standing right next to them, but it was denied service. However, Signal allowed the text.
The most important thing people in the US can do is physically email the link to 'alt. news' organisations, but they won't usually touch my work either.
So, unfortunately, posting a link to social media is not just next to useless, it is also worse for the poster because their own account gets deboosted and shadowbanned.
That's how radioactive my work is.
I’m sure you’re correct. It’s very sad what has become of so called free countries. Most folks I know don’t even use email anymore. And I have a few family & even fewer friends who still use it. And still refuse to discuss anything jab related, as if acknowledging or discussing the damage done makes it worse? There is such a willful blindness to the extent of corruption in this whole scenario, IMO.
It definitely takes time for people to process at their own rate, but we’re running out of time. If even one hears, or reads something that makes them think seriously about what’s being done, well, that matters. Keep keeping on the best you can. God will have the last word. He’s also the originator, guardian, & publisher of truth.
"God will have the last word. He’s also the originator, guardian, & publisher of truth."
Amen!
Your comment is also so fascinating. If people do not have email and only use social media, their entire world is highly curated, managed and weaponised. However, politicians, media, journalists, police, and lawyers have and use email in their professional capacities. Maybe that is where the focus should be.
Sleeper agent, activate!
Edit: LMAO! Mate - whatever they are paying you for this, it is not nearly enough.