"Bad weather" caused all the new graves...but didn't affect the surrounding areas...just the exact square on top of the graves?
The lady in the video says it's at Oamaru cemetery. Any Kiwis want to do some investigation here? See what the 'bad weather' means exactly and if the local area was one of the top 'hot spots' for jab deaths. That's what I would do.
Te Whatu Ora has launched an employment investigation after saying a health agency worker spread misinformation using government data about Covid-19 vaccines.
Apa said Te Whatu Ora wanted to remind people vaccines were safe and effective and they should keep up to date with their shots to protect themselves and their communities.
Should be interesting to see how this story develops over time as people pull apart the raw data. Comments now open to paid subs only as I do not have time to curate. Thanks for your input, readers.
Dec 1, 2023·edited Dec 1, 2023Liked by ExcessDeathsAU
Here's the transcript for the first video:
"This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
DESCRIPTION ON VIDEO PAGE: "This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
TRANSCRIPTION
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This was filmed as a man and woman drive through a cemetery. The man, as he drives, points out the open window at fresh graves.
WOMAN'S VOICE: 94 dead bodies! These are all freshly buried.
MAN DRIVING: [inaudible]
WOMAN'S VOICE: In a small town of Oamaru. [man driving starts to go in reverse to pass by the same graves again] Just come to check my babies. And look at all these new graves, mate. Why? Why? Why so many? We never have this many. I've come here for the last 8, 9 years.
MAN DRIVING: Oh, 21s and 22s.
WOMAN'S VOICE: These are all deaths in the, the last year.
MAN DRIVING: [inaudible]
WOMAN'S VOICE: Like fresh as [inaudible]. These are all fresh. They haven't even got headstones yet. So we just counted how many was that?
MAN DRIVING: And 9— [stops car]
WOMAN'S VOICE: 98.
MAN DRIVING: 92. [starts driving forward past the graves again]
WOMAN'S VOICE: Oh, 92. New graves. In Oamaru. Wow.
TEXT ON SCREEN: this is regarding the gravesite video from oamaru cemetery
WOMAN: Actually [inaudible] I'm posting at because of the video that I posted about all the gravesites that I actually saw when I was visiting my two dead sons' grave.* And I came across that, me and my mate were cruising, there visit my sons and I saw it and freaked out.
So I took a video because I've never seen anything like that. And I didn't know why, OK? Now Oamaru has since said, because it did go viral and it was all over FaceBook and everything, the council has apparently since said that it is because of the bad weather. So that's what they reckon, so that must be it. So, yeah. Hmmm. [raises eyebrows]
Didn't mean to scare anybody. I was just stating what I was seeing because it fu#king freaked me out. And yeah. Hmmm. [raises eyebrows] Think what you like and leave it at that, eh?
But next time I go out there, I will, if I do notice something weird I will actually investigate further myself. Hmmm.
1:07
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
* She refers to this video, reposted by someone else at:
"This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
Nov 30, 2023·edited Nov 30, 2023Liked by ExcessDeathsAU
Keep up the good work buddy.
I don't recall if I sent this to you but your readers may want to see the truth.
The pharmacist seems to realize only moments into the conversation the ramifications of her actions.
She tries to find the words to justify what she was part of and, IMO, fails miserably......... all of this is so unfk'nbelievable ...... no words......
I posted this comment yesterday elsewhere.
Go to 5:38 for the pharma scene.
It's f'n disgusting what ordinary people will do, unwittingly perhaps, yet are responsible for the health of others.
I remember this when it first happened along with many of the clips on this video, but it's a great compilation of the timeline of this evil.
Is it any wonder why over 20 years ago I took responsibility for my own health and quit allopathic medicine altogether?
If people weren’t on alopathic medicine we wouldn’t have had all these injuries and excess deaths. What has happened is a very sad indictment of a very sick society. We all need to get healthier and healthier.
One of my biggest questions is: How can Sweden not have (noticeable or significant) excess death issues? They lived their lives mostly freely without any crazy measures but did have high compliance in the needle. How is that possible? I keep reading and reading but have not come across any answers.
Do you know about Die Fackel 2.0 Substack? He has lots of commenters that analyse EU mortality data. If you drop your comment there I am sure someone will be pleased to help you as best they can. https://fackel.substack.com/
Sorry. But there's a whole lot wrong with this interview. I've posted my long list elsewhere, but suffice to say, it took me no time at all to get up to 14 red flags, on just a first listen.
It reminds me of the Poornima Wagh interview.
When something comes out of nowhere, and it's suddenly EVERYWHERE - we need to examine it very, very closely.
Because, I suspect, like this, it's usual intent is to discredit the truth, and all the efforts of thousands of great researchers.
I don't have to tell anyone here the anti-vaxxer community is being closely monitored and studied intently at the moment, because anti-vaccine sentiment is at an all-time high. So throwing out a poisoned minnow is not just possible - it's probable.
Alarm bells should have started going off immediately at the "we are stardust/we are golden" rant, which sets the tone for "the slightly unhinged anti-vax whistleblower".
This is a mixture of part truth/part misdirection that feels like a gift now, but may not later.
... to descredit the efforts of thousands of great researchers that have been demonstrating exactly the same thing for months and months ? "anti-vaxxer" is an obsolete term given that there are no vaccines anymore, it's all nanotech soup now.
The whole interview just felt off to me, and not authentic.
I don't doubt Liz Gunn's integrity, but this interview is being amplified excessively, and as I said, when a newcomer like this comes out of nowhere, and is suddenly everywhere…there's usually some high-visibility, background boosting at play.
1. A “whistleblower” who uses a pseudonym to hide his name, but doesn't bother hiding his face or voice.
2. She says she's respecting his use of the pseudonym, and ONLY knows him by that pseudonym, so how could she have “vetted him” if she doesn't even know his name?
3. It's strange that she says this is the most complex case she's ever worked on, and she has sent the data to multiple sources for scrutiny, but she is reacting as though this is the first time she's seeing it.
4. He presents as slightly-dishevelled in his slightly-crumpled shirt.
5. And begins, not with “I’m a database administrator working for NZ Health and was privy to Government data on vaccine deaths and injuries” but with a weird philosophical rant about creation. It's an odd first priority (especially for a “data guy” there to discuss his data).
6. Add in a liberal dose of anxiety and emotional instability, the subtle dishevelled appearance, and the rant about the stars and the universe, and you've just discredited this witness in any potential, future litigation going forward.
7. Has a “Masters in Science” and is “a scientist” yet is working as a database administrator on a system he says he built, but never references any IT background or programming skills.
8. Refers to 2022 as the year of the roll-out when in fact the first vaccines were given in December of 2020, and rolled out in earnest in 2021.
9. He shows his graph listing the top 10 worst batches, with Batch ID's such as 1, 8, 3, 72 and 61, when no batches have ever been numbered like that. They are 5-6 character alpha/numeric combinations.
10. He tells us his system is extremely accurate (in fact states he is the only person in NZ with this level of access to Government data), yet says in the next breath it only shows deaths. No other adverse events? No injuries? No ED hospital admissions?
11. And why would a system for payment processing, be also acting as an adverse events tracking/surveillance system, which just adds another 50 levels of complexity? (He says he's “the only one with access to this data” and “nobody but me knows about this data” - so how is 1 man managing both payments AND adverse events for all of NZ?).
12. He then adds “the Government have this data, it's impossible to deny” but later floats the idea that “maybe the Government didn't know”.
13. All while appearing to divert our gaze (& blame) to the Pharmacies, Medical Centres and Nursing Homes responsible.
14. Mixing truth with misdirection.
His data may well be right. It probably is. We know NZ suffered high excess deaths, and I don't dispute there was carnage. But I just question the above anomalies, and don't put it past TPTB to amplify this, only to discredit and sabotage it later.
It's true that there are many anomalies, you make many good points. So, given that the topic of excess deaths is inevitably going mainstream, the idea would be to bring forward someone that presents the (official) data, a bit awkwardly and making slight mistakes, so that TPTB and MSM can easily disprove it, say "look, this is all wrong, nothing to worry about", and then introduce another narrative ?
This is my take: There will be no one piece of evidence at this point that will convince anyone or change anything.
I have always operated on the principle that I do not care about 'movements,' what the establishment or what anyone else thinks of me. ExcessDeathsAU (me) is banned from all social media and not invited to the conferences or seminars and never will be, and people rarely cite or recognise what I do.
I do not have a platform, brand and most people are ashamed of my work. Even Christians hate me and are vocal in telling me so in person and online.
What I saw in this particular story was something different: finally, a government whistleblower. I also thought it was weird that Gunn did not verify his name off-camera with ID (he has been doxxed already anyway and NZ government is running media damage control).
Yes, there are some strange anomalies, but as I am a clownworld documentarian, document clownworld I shall.
In my opinion there will be no 'grand reveal' and no human-scale justice because we are in end times and looking down the barrel of total Satanic capture. I work on behalf of God and the few readers that enjoy it, trying to ignore the government harassment and random abuse from keyboard warriors.
So, I am not sure if I can at least re-assure you that if there is a coordinated promotion campaign with regards to this particular story I am at least not involved in it - I saw it and thought it was important due to the uniqueness of the leaker, not so much that I thought the data were perfect or would change the world.
I think it was obvious that world doesn't exist anymore when they rolled out the shots in the first place which they knew would kill based on existing data in the literature...or perhaps we shall see justice...in two more weeks!!!
No need for reassurances my friend. I most definitely was not implying you were in any way part of an agenda (and apologies if it seemed so). I think this interview has piqued everyone's interest, including mine, and regardless, its base premise remains true; people died needlessly. And in excess.
But definitely not any sort of inference on the quality and integrity of your work, which I commend and appreciate.
It takes courage to put yourself out there, and I am sorry to hear you are targeted for your efforts. The sort of people who would attack your work, I imagine are all the same fools we've spent nearly 4 years trying to save from themselves, but who can't be reasoned with. Their minds are closed to anything new, and they're arrogant enough to vehemently dismiss something, despite knowing nothing about it.
It can't be easy. But in the end, the flaw is their's, not your's. Eventually we just have to leave them to their ignorance. They will never understand the enormity of the danger we face, or comprehend the significance of the times we are living through.
And while Covid may have detonated our close relationships (often with people just like the above) alternatives have filled the void. Substack I suspect became the refuge for the ostracised, the black sheep, the 3rd-child, the critical thinkers and the dissenters. And it connects us by providing a glimpse into the integrity, humility and honour of others, in their writing, and by giving us a window to the soul that we probably never had (or rarely had) with people in our past lives anyway.
So stay strong my friend, you're doing God's work. I too don't know if we'll ever see true justice, but your efforts, and those of others are, without doubt, collectively applying enormous pressure and the dam is cracking in earnest now.
Stephen Fry once said “Progress is not achieved by preachers and guardians of morality, but by madmen, hermits, heretics, rebels and sceptics".
And at this moment in history, there is nothing we need more than ClownWorld Documentarian heretics, rebels and sceptics.
Dec 1, 2023·edited Dec 1, 2023Liked by ExcessDeathsAU
Does a person have to alive to have been billed?
The reason I’m asking is this may turn out to be a billing scandal if it is not the shots. I’m not sure how it is NZ but here in Australia they only need your Medicare number to bill the government, which they already have on file if your an existing patient. It’s not unheard of for doctors to be caught billing more hours than physically possible. That’s how they’ve been caught scamming the public health system in the past.
My question was: how do we know the 'events' were real. So this was along your lines of thinking with regards to billing. We need a cross-check with regards to death certificates and actually being vaccinated.
Yet, there are broad patterns in the data from different a priori groups indicating that the jab kills well above NZ background rate of 0.75%, even if there are anomalies.
This would be cleared up with a data release so people can pull it apart.
Edit: apparently the data have been released on Steve Kirsch Substack and Fenton is on the job. Will update article. I am not going to go through this as I do not have time, but this is the way.
Exactly, or they get it overturned on appeal. Sometime they get let off with a slap on the wrist like you say because it’s a “one off” lapse of judgement by an otherwise fine up standing member of the community. 😀
Unless, they’re a shonky ethnic plastic surgeon that’s botched a boob job, you won’t see many doctors being outed on a Current Affair. I’m sure it’s because they are all so good at what they do.
Like any profession or trade the quality probably varies with skill and experience but I do think some might just be in it for the money.
Never apologise for showing me information - even if I have seen it 100 times. It's the one person who shows me that one thing that could make all the difference. Good on you Steve-o.
Thanks - I had watched it yesterday morning. Good to see a human responding like a human. The numbers - particularly in some locations - are just incredible. May this video travel the globe and wake many up.
So true, Kathleen. That is why I wanted to focus on the bravery of Mr Smith. In the coming weeks and months his life will be turned into a living hell. There will be scoffers and abusers (as opposed to those genuinely questioning the data).
Regardless of what the data show (I shall look forward to Fenton's paper), we will remember the bravery of Sir Winston of the Antipodes.
If he is the real deal, given the response to this video, I am worried beyond his ability to generate an income. Before, he would have gone through Wikileaks, but we know what happened there.
We already have the identify and disrupt bill which is bad enough, but once Substack goes with the Australian digital censorship bill it's only a matter of time for me.
If this number is from an aged care home it mirrors what has been happening globally after the shots were rolled out, but also early on in covid, likely due to murder via midazolam etc.
Dear Readers,
Comments now open to all. Thank you for bearing with me.
Do you guys remember this? https://rumble.com/v1fsgcz-90-fresh-new-graves-in-a-small-town-of-13000-in-new-zealand.html
Lady posted a follow up video after her videos were blocked and censored: https://rumble.com/v1g0lnp-local-authorities-90-fresh-graves-because-of-bad-weather.html
"Bad weather" caused all the new graves...but didn't affect the surrounding areas...just the exact square on top of the graves?
The lady in the video says it's at Oamaru cemetery. Any Kiwis want to do some investigation here? See what the 'bad weather' means exactly and if the local area was one of the top 'hot spots' for jab deaths. That's what I would do.
****Update to amalgamate pinned comments:
1 Dec, 2023 10:32 AM
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/health-worker-spreads-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-te-whatu-ora-launches-employment-investigation/ZN3KEA5V7ZFEHHUQLR56Z57AZY/
Te Whatu Ora has launched an employment investigation after saying a health agency worker spread misinformation using government data about Covid-19 vaccines.
Apa said Te Whatu Ora wanted to remind people vaccines were safe and effective and they should keep up to date with their shots to protect themselves and their communities.
Edit: Here's another article: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/503703/health-nz-staff-member-investigated-for-covid-19-misinformation
****Dec 2.
Should be interesting to see how this story develops over time as people pull apart the raw data. Comments now open to paid subs only as I do not have time to curate. Thanks for your input, readers.
Here's the transcript for the first video:
"This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
Seemoorerocks97, posted August 12, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1fsgcz-90-fresh-new-graves-in-a-small-town-of-13000-in-new-zealand.html
DESCRIPTION ON VIDEO PAGE: "This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
TRANSCRIPTION
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: This was filmed as a man and woman drive through a cemetery. The man, as he drives, points out the open window at fresh graves.
MAN DRIVING: This is f#cked!
WOMAN'S VOICE: So far 66.
MAN DRIVING: 66!
WOMAN'S VOICE: HO!!
MAN DRIVING: 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83—
WOMAN'S VOICE: Oh my God.
MAN DRIVING: —84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94.
WOMAN'S VOICE: 94 dead bodies! These are all freshly buried.
MAN DRIVING: [inaudible]
WOMAN'S VOICE: In a small town of Oamaru. [man driving starts to go in reverse to pass by the same graves again] Just come to check my babies. And look at all these new graves, mate. Why? Why? Why so many? We never have this many. I've come here for the last 8, 9 years.
MAN DRIVING: Oh, 21s and 22s.
WOMAN'S VOICE: These are all deaths in the, the last year.
MAN DRIVING: [inaudible]
WOMAN'S VOICE: Like fresh as [inaudible]. These are all fresh. They haven't even got headstones yet. So we just counted how many was that?
MAN DRIVING: And 9— [stops car]
WOMAN'S VOICE: 98.
MAN DRIVING: 92. [starts driving forward past the graves again]
WOMAN'S VOICE: Oh, 92. New graves. In Oamaru. Wow.
1:17
[END]
Second video:
"Local authorities: 90 fresh graves 'because of bad weather'"
Seemorerocks97, posted August 14, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1g0lnp-local-authorities-90-fresh-graves-because-of-bad-weather.html
Hat tip: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/new-zealand-government-whistle-blower/comments
TRANSCRIPT
TEXT ON SCREEN: this is regarding the gravesite video from oamaru cemetery
WOMAN: Actually [inaudible] I'm posting at because of the video that I posted about all the gravesites that I actually saw when I was visiting my two dead sons' grave.* And I came across that, me and my mate were cruising, there visit my sons and I saw it and freaked out.
So I took a video because I've never seen anything like that. And I didn't know why, OK? Now Oamaru has since said, because it did go viral and it was all over FaceBook and everything, the council has apparently since said that it is because of the bad weather. So that's what they reckon, so that must be it. So, yeah. Hmmm. [raises eyebrows]
Didn't mean to scare anybody. I was just stating what I was seeing because it fu#king freaked me out. And yeah. Hmmm. [raises eyebrows] Think what you like and leave it at that, eh?
But next time I go out there, I will, if I do notice something weird I will actually investigate further myself. Hmmm.
1:07
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
* She refers to this video, reposted by someone else at:
"This video, depicting a couple from Oamaru, New Zealand with a population of 13,000, was quickly removed from Facebook. These are just burials. What about cremations?"
Seemoorerocks97
posted August 12, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1fsgcz-90-fresh-new-graves-in-a-small-town-of-13000-in-new-zealand.html
My fate appears to be to sit and look at the death as some people appeal to the One True Scotsman and the others say 'there is no Scotsman.'
I'm so tired Mrs B.
I read a similar story about Invercargill cemetry. Council said they were renovating or some such thing (not weather related).
Of course, when I renovate I always move bodies around and create new graves in a neat square.
Keep up the good work buddy.
I don't recall if I sent this to you but your readers may want to see the truth.
The pharmacist seems to realize only moments into the conversation the ramifications of her actions.
She tries to find the words to justify what she was part of and, IMO, fails miserably......... all of this is so unfk'nbelievable ...... no words......
I posted this comment yesterday elsewhere.
Go to 5:38 for the pharma scene.
It's f'n disgusting what ordinary people will do, unwittingly perhaps, yet are responsible for the health of others.
I remember this when it first happened along with many of the clips on this video, but it's a great compilation of the timeline of this evil.
Is it any wonder why over 20 years ago I took responsibility for my own health and quit allopathic medicine altogether?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Us3BNniFqLZa/
I remember this phone call. The stupidity of the pharmacist was breathtaking. The competency crisis is real.
If people weren’t on alopathic medicine we wouldn’t have had all these injuries and excess deaths. What has happened is a very sad indictment of a very sick society. We all need to get healthier and healthier.
I don't know what to say...except I am so sorry. I am sorry for all of us..but you guys were pushed to the wall.
You need to start admiring yourself ...you held out. You didn't give up hope. You are still here, telling truths.
Bravo. Big Hug from America. We need you.
🙌🏼
One of my biggest questions is: How can Sweden not have (noticeable or significant) excess death issues? They lived their lives mostly freely without any crazy measures but did have high compliance in the needle. How is that possible? I keep reading and reading but have not come across any answers.
Do you know about Die Fackel 2.0 Substack? He has lots of commenters that analyse EU mortality data. If you drop your comment there I am sure someone will be pleased to help you as best they can. https://fackel.substack.com/
I may just quit reading all together and maybe it will make sense.
Or I may end up where I started.
Wondering, "What the hell is going on around here?"
I saw this first thing this morning, and thought of you.
Unspeakable.
I mention it often...but what you endured was far worse than what we had over here.
I have such immense respect for you, and those that stood up against the tyranny.
And held your ground.
I'm sorry that the world still largely has no idea what you have been through, and what was done.
I'm proud to know you.
Thank you dear Sarah. Your stack is wonderful by the way.
I'm in excellent company...
We just have to keep going for the children. It's the only thing we can do.
I'm with you.
✊🏼
Sorry. But there's a whole lot wrong with this interview. I've posted my long list elsewhere, but suffice to say, it took me no time at all to get up to 14 red flags, on just a first listen.
It reminds me of the Poornima Wagh interview.
When something comes out of nowhere, and it's suddenly EVERYWHERE - we need to examine it very, very closely.
Because, I suspect, like this, it's usual intent is to discredit the truth, and all the efforts of thousands of great researchers.
I don't have to tell anyone here the anti-vaxxer community is being closely monitored and studied intently at the moment, because anti-vaccine sentiment is at an all-time high. So throwing out a poisoned minnow is not just possible - it's probable.
Alarm bells should have started going off immediately at the "we are stardust/we are golden" rant, which sets the tone for "the slightly unhinged anti-vax whistleblower".
This is a mixture of part truth/part misdirection that feels like a gift now, but may not later.
... to descredit the efforts of thousands of great researchers that have been demonstrating exactly the same thing for months and months ? "anti-vaxxer" is an obsolete term given that there are no vaccines anymore, it's all nanotech soup now.
Can you link to your list so that others may read it?
Listed below.
The whole interview just felt off to me, and not authentic.
I don't doubt Liz Gunn's integrity, but this interview is being amplified excessively, and as I said, when a newcomer like this comes out of nowhere, and is suddenly everywhere…there's usually some high-visibility, background boosting at play.
1. A “whistleblower” who uses a pseudonym to hide his name, but doesn't bother hiding his face or voice.
2. She says she's respecting his use of the pseudonym, and ONLY knows him by that pseudonym, so how could she have “vetted him” if she doesn't even know his name?
3. It's strange that she says this is the most complex case she's ever worked on, and she has sent the data to multiple sources for scrutiny, but she is reacting as though this is the first time she's seeing it.
4. He presents as slightly-dishevelled in his slightly-crumpled shirt.
5. And begins, not with “I’m a database administrator working for NZ Health and was privy to Government data on vaccine deaths and injuries” but with a weird philosophical rant about creation. It's an odd first priority (especially for a “data guy” there to discuss his data).
6. Add in a liberal dose of anxiety and emotional instability, the subtle dishevelled appearance, and the rant about the stars and the universe, and you've just discredited this witness in any potential, future litigation going forward.
7. Has a “Masters in Science” and is “a scientist” yet is working as a database administrator on a system he says he built, but never references any IT background or programming skills.
8. Refers to 2022 as the year of the roll-out when in fact the first vaccines were given in December of 2020, and rolled out in earnest in 2021.
9. He shows his graph listing the top 10 worst batches, with Batch ID's such as 1, 8, 3, 72 and 61, when no batches have ever been numbered like that. They are 5-6 character alpha/numeric combinations.
10. He tells us his system is extremely accurate (in fact states he is the only person in NZ with this level of access to Government data), yet says in the next breath it only shows deaths. No other adverse events? No injuries? No ED hospital admissions?
11. And why would a system for payment processing, be also acting as an adverse events tracking/surveillance system, which just adds another 50 levels of complexity? (He says he's “the only one with access to this data” and “nobody but me knows about this data” - so how is 1 man managing both payments AND adverse events for all of NZ?).
12. He then adds “the Government have this data, it's impossible to deny” but later floats the idea that “maybe the Government didn't know”.
13. All while appearing to divert our gaze (& blame) to the Pharmacies, Medical Centres and Nursing Homes responsible.
14. Mixing truth with misdirection.
His data may well be right. It probably is. We know NZ suffered high excess deaths, and I don't dispute there was carnage. But I just question the above anomalies, and don't put it past TPTB to amplify this, only to discredit and sabotage it later.
It feels inauthentic, and planted for a purpose.
It's true that there are many anomalies, you make many good points. So, given that the topic of excess deaths is inevitably going mainstream, the idea would be to bring forward someone that presents the (official) data, a bit awkwardly and making slight mistakes, so that TPTB and MSM can easily disprove it, say "look, this is all wrong, nothing to worry about", and then introduce another narrative ?
Exactly my thoughts. I think it's a setup with holes in it for that reason.
The health freedom community will run with it, only for TPTB to come out later and point out the inaccuracies.
It discredits the whistleblower.
It discredits Liz Gunn.
And it shoots down the anti-vaxxers with "You just got your facts wrong. Again".
It also dissuades anyone else from coming forward.
And sets up Liz Gunn for failure if she attempts any future litigation using this witness.
The fact it's on blast everywhere makes me deeply suspicious.
(Or maybe I'm just getting old and cynical after almost 4 years of top tier Bullshitus Extremus).
I think these are good points.
This is my take: There will be no one piece of evidence at this point that will convince anyone or change anything.
I have always operated on the principle that I do not care about 'movements,' what the establishment or what anyone else thinks of me. ExcessDeathsAU (me) is banned from all social media and not invited to the conferences or seminars and never will be, and people rarely cite or recognise what I do.
I do not have a platform, brand and most people are ashamed of my work. Even Christians hate me and are vocal in telling me so in person and online.
What I saw in this particular story was something different: finally, a government whistleblower. I also thought it was weird that Gunn did not verify his name off-camera with ID (he has been doxxed already anyway and NZ government is running media damage control).
Yes, there are some strange anomalies, but as I am a clownworld documentarian, document clownworld I shall.
In my opinion there will be no 'grand reveal' and no human-scale justice because we are in end times and looking down the barrel of total Satanic capture. I work on behalf of God and the few readers that enjoy it, trying to ignore the government harassment and random abuse from keyboard warriors.
So, I am not sure if I can at least re-assure you that if there is a coordinated promotion campaign with regards to this particular story I am at least not involved in it - I saw it and thought it was important due to the uniqueness of the leaker, not so much that I thought the data were perfect or would change the world.
I think it was obvious that world doesn't exist anymore when they rolled out the shots in the first place which they knew would kill based on existing data in the literature...or perhaps we shall see justice...in two more weeks!!!
No need for reassurances my friend. I most definitely was not implying you were in any way part of an agenda (and apologies if it seemed so). I think this interview has piqued everyone's interest, including mine, and regardless, its base premise remains true; people died needlessly. And in excess.
But definitely not any sort of inference on the quality and integrity of your work, which I commend and appreciate.
It takes courage to put yourself out there, and I am sorry to hear you are targeted for your efforts. The sort of people who would attack your work, I imagine are all the same fools we've spent nearly 4 years trying to save from themselves, but who can't be reasoned with. Their minds are closed to anything new, and they're arrogant enough to vehemently dismiss something, despite knowing nothing about it.
It can't be easy. But in the end, the flaw is their's, not your's. Eventually we just have to leave them to their ignorance. They will never understand the enormity of the danger we face, or comprehend the significance of the times we are living through.
And while Covid may have detonated our close relationships (often with people just like the above) alternatives have filled the void. Substack I suspect became the refuge for the ostracised, the black sheep, the 3rd-child, the critical thinkers and the dissenters. And it connects us by providing a glimpse into the integrity, humility and honour of others, in their writing, and by giving us a window to the soul that we probably never had (or rarely had) with people in our past lives anyway.
So stay strong my friend, you're doing God's work. I too don't know if we'll ever see true justice, but your efforts, and those of others are, without doubt, collectively applying enormous pressure and the dam is cracking in earnest now.
Stephen Fry once said “Progress is not achieved by preachers and guardians of morality, but by madmen, hermits, heretics, rebels and sceptics".
And at this moment in history, there is nothing we need more than ClownWorld Documentarian heretics, rebels and sceptics.
Best/.
Does a person have to alive to have been billed?
The reason I’m asking is this may turn out to be a billing scandal if it is not the shots. I’m not sure how it is NZ but here in Australia they only need your Medicare number to bill the government, which they already have on file if your an existing patient. It’s not unheard of for doctors to be caught billing more hours than physically possible. That’s how they’ve been caught scamming the public health system in the past.
My question was: how do we know the 'events' were real. So this was along your lines of thinking with regards to billing. We need a cross-check with regards to death certificates and actually being vaccinated.
Yet, there are broad patterns in the data from different a priori groups indicating that the jab kills well above NZ background rate of 0.75%, even if there are anomalies.
This would be cleared up with a data release so people can pull it apart.
Edit: apparently the data have been released on Steve Kirsch Substack and Fenton is on the job. Will update article. I am not going to go through this as I do not have time, but this is the way.
Top-notch.
For which they get a slap on the wrist
Exactly, or they get it overturned on appeal. Sometime they get let off with a slap on the wrist like you say because it’s a “one off” lapse of judgement by an otherwise fine up standing member of the community. 😀
Unless, they’re a shonky ethnic plastic surgeon that’s botched a boob job, you won’t see many doctors being outed on a Current Affair. I’m sure it’s because they are all so good at what they do.
Like any profession or trade the quality probably varies with skill and experience but I do think some might just be in it for the money.
Disciplinary action is always pretty lenient and kept in house.
That’s how it works if you you’ve got a strong union (AMA). CFMEU eat your heart out. 😀
But seeing those workers hand it to the Union bosses and the Riot Police was pure gold
One of the best days of my life tbqh fam.
Also the 'picnic protests' where they set up smoko in the middle of the street.
Brilliant interview, I watched it today (sorry I left interview in one of your comments not realising you'd written this already!)
Telling time codes I noted
This is damning...
31 mins 15 secs ... 30% of people died within a month who received injection on same day, same injection facility...
At 48.30... chances of vax not being the cause 100 billion to one... That's astounding certainty.
https://rumble.com/v3ynskd-operation-m.o.a.r-mother-of-all-revelations.html
Never apologise for showing me information - even if I have seen it 100 times. It's the one person who shows me that one thing that could make all the difference. Good on you Steve-o.
Cheers mate, keep up the great work ... The info is starting to flow too fast for them to keep a lid on now.
Thanks - I had watched it yesterday morning. Good to see a human responding like a human. The numbers - particularly in some locations - are just incredible. May this video travel the globe and wake many up.
So true, Kathleen. That is why I wanted to focus on the bravery of Mr Smith. In the coming weeks and months his life will be turned into a living hell. There will be scoffers and abusers (as opposed to those genuinely questioning the data).
Regardless of what the data show (I shall look forward to Fenton's paper), we will remember the bravery of Sir Winston of the Antipodes.
Someone should start a givesendgo for the man. He's not going to be able to work for a while.
If he is the real deal, given the response to this video, I am worried beyond his ability to generate an income. Before, he would have gone through Wikileaks, but we know what happened there.
People forget how physically (and digitally) isolated, limited and censored we are here in the Antipodes and how few options normal people have to connect with the world. We really are at the mercy of the government, and when we are not, the government accuses us of using 'conspiracy theory sites' https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/503703/health-nz-staff-member-investigated-for-covid-19-misinformation
We already have the identify and disrupt bill which is bad enough, but once Substack goes with the Australian digital censorship bill it's only a matter of time for me.
WTF? 30%????
If this number is from an aged care home it mirrors what has been happening globally after the shots were rolled out, but also early on in covid, likely due to murder via midazolam etc.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/372/bmj.n149.full.pdf